Is the UN a U-Nuch?
Why is the UN a U-Nuch?
When North Korea detonated the their nuclear weapon, the world was outraged and the United Nations Security Council only needed 30 minutes to issue a unanimous condemnation. However, within 48 hours, the main parties to the council (US, China, Russia) did nothing to threaten the survival of the Communist regime.
Upon the formation of the UN Security Council, the US and the Soviet Union fell into a half-century of cold war during which the UN was paralysed.
When Bush decided to attack Iraq, it led to a bitter division in the Security Council that it was reduced to a bystander when the second Gulf War broke out.
It had been a bystander to the Balkan wars of the '90s, because Russia's interest in protecting its traditional ally, Serbia, prevented any U.N. action.
It is a bystander today in Darfur, because China has an interest in Sudan's oil and the Arab League protects one of its own.
It has been a bystander on Iran's nuclear program, endlessly postponing the consideration of sanctions, because Russia and China have other more compelling interests: commercial relations with a rising Islamic power and oil supplies for a growing China.
The UN could not endorse war. It could not stop war. It could only watch war. This is why it is a U-Nuch.
The article is a paraphrased version of Charles Krauthammer's viewpoint in TIME titled ...But Not At The U.N..


